I am always amazed at what gets done to a retouched photo. Some of the comments after the article were terrible, especially the discussion about Hill's "back fat". This was great:

"She looks like the typical overly tanned gone-to-fat desperate-to-look-younger (dressed inappropriately for her age) middle-aged woman who was once unimaginatively hot-ish. In other words, pre-photoshop, she looks a lot like me. ... i think she's quite a bit more of a fatty than me too."

If anyone wants to know why magazines Photoshop pictures, there's your answer. Jerks like the commenter above are the ones buying the mags.