ext_110930 ([identity profile] charleshaynes.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] pantryslut 2009-04-09 01:46 am (UTC)

Yeah. I stopped doing things with "bisexuals" when all we had in common was bisexuality because I discovered that wasn't really very much in common at all - especially when that's their primary identification. I'm bisexual kind of like I'm bipedal, it's just a fact.

And this whole "scene" "community" whatever? Being kinky isn't enough in common, being queer isn't enough (though it's closer), being a gender activist, fat activist, whatever single facet isn't enough.

But that doesn't mean there isn't a "scene" or "community" that I'm part of - I think there is. It's just a lot smaller and harder to find than FetLife. The "articulate, reality-based, gender queer, sex positive, kinky, witty ..." well that's a start - that community, that scene. That's the one I belong to.

But another part of the problem with FetLife and online communities in general, is that for me, it's not enough that *you* might consider yourself part of that community. If I were to create a community that claimed to be for people having all the characteristics I describe above, it wouldn't work. Anyone who actually HAD those characteristics probably wouldn't join, and anyone who did join probably wouldn't have those characteristics.

Bottom line? I think there is a "scene" that you (and I) are part of - but you aren't likely to "find it" online. At best you might find some leads on people worth meeting. Mostly we're left with word of mouth, and kissing a few frogs to tell each other about the ones who aren't.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting