I am always amazed at what gets done to a retouched photo. Some of the comments after the article were terrible, especially the discussion about Hill's "back fat". This was great:
"She looks like the typical overly tanned gone-to-fat desperate-to-look-younger (dressed inappropriately for her age) middle-aged woman who was once unimaginatively hot-ish. In other words, pre-photoshop, she looks a lot like me. ... i think she's quite a bit more of a fatty than me too."
If anyone wants to know why magazines Photoshop pictures, there's your answer. Jerks like the commenter above are the ones buying the mags.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-07-18 01:39 am (UTC)"She looks like the typical overly tanned gone-to-fat desperate-to-look-younger (dressed inappropriately for her age) middle-aged woman who was once unimaginatively hot-ish. In other words, pre-photoshop, she looks a lot like me. ... i think she's quite a bit more of a fatty than me too."
If anyone wants to know why magazines Photoshop pictures, there's your answer. Jerks like the commenter above are the ones buying the mags.