pantryslut: (Default)
[personal profile] pantryslut
Waitaminnit. I point out that the pre-pregnancy thing wouldn't be necessary if we had universal health care in this country and she calls me a libertarian?!

Date: 2007-06-14 07:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalmn.livejournal.com
hee hee!

i am very curious who did that.

Date: 2007-06-14 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pantryslut.livejournal.com
I didn't catch her name, unfortunately.

Date: 2007-06-14 08:16 pm (UTC)
ext_40143: (Default)
From: [identity profile] caramida.livejournal.com
In the dictionary, next to the definition of "unclear on the concept"...

Date: 2007-06-15 01:29 am (UTC)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
From: [personal profile] redbird
If this was Sunday, maybe she'd been up awake continuously since Friday night and losing words?

Date: 2007-06-15 01:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deepforestowl.livejournal.com
*bursts out laughing*

Date: 2007-06-15 01:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] genderfur.livejournal.com
Um? What's the "pre-pregnancy thing"? and did she maybe mean communist?

Date: 2007-06-15 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pantryslut.livejournal.com

Pre-pregnancy links:

CDC Report: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5506a1.htm

I can't find the Washington Post article that actually gave this set of suggestions the tag "pre-pregnant."

She was definitely not calling me (and my co-panelists) Communist. She thought the guidelines were spiffy and a great first step toward, you know, a state that was warm and nurturing and respectful of women. So to criticize them was to be libertarian and wrongheaded. I was obviously just resistant to the idea of *any* gubmint programs being beneficial to folks.

Uh, no.

Date: 2007-06-15 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] innerdoggie.livejournal.com
Why are the "child-bearing years" always defined as 15-44, when the average age of menarche is 12 and the average age of menopause is 51?

Date: 2007-06-15 11:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] innerdoggie.livejournal.com
Skimming the guidelines, it looks like even if we had perfect health care for everybody, women would still need to think about pre-pregnancy changes. For example, you might have been a moderate drinker, but decide to teetotal during pregnancy. Moderate drinking is usually good for you, but it might not be great for fetuses. (I know this is still under study).

There was a lot of stuff I didn't know on the list. I knew about Accutane, but not about treatment of hypothyroidism and such.

I suppose the biggest issue is that half of the pregnancies aren't planned, so women wouldn't have a chance to get in better health before conceiving.

I wonder what men need to do, too? Aren't there drugs, toxins, etc. that can mess up sperm?

Profile

pantryslut: (Default)
pantryslut

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 7th, 2026 01:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios